ONTOLOGy of the MYTH The myth is essentially a place, a topology of the myth of the abyss, the fondatezza, aldilà:la the history of the myth is the history of the places of the myth, the history mitika of the myth is the history of the Being mitiko, or the eternal return of the myth or the infinite resonance of the being in the myth, in the latenza, guarded, cured for eventuarsi in the epokè mythical. The history of the myth is the history of the glade of the Being, of the diradato Being, clears, free of Being in the abyss mitiko, without null, nothing, aim, sunset, eclisse.
Nobody still has been free to search the history of the ontologia of the myth, afterlife of the theological ermeneutica, beyond the categorical, epistemica, paradigmatica metaphysics nichilista. Not there is neither the ontologia of the mythical being, neither ontosofia of the myth or the history mitika of the myth. The history of the myth I found myself on the mythical history of the libertà:senza it are free to contemplate the myth, not is myth but single theological fondamentalismo, teocrazia:la history mitika of the myth is the history mitika of the freedom of Being in presence of the contemplation of the Being divinity. The myth is when the being places itself dinanzi in the contemplation of the Being that gives itself, throws itself to the presence in the glade, in the topology of the Being, which ontologia of the poetante Being, the Gegengrundsein that eventua in the ontovarietà of the gettatezza of the myth is the poetante glade that it guards, kriptata, latent the cure of the Being. The places of the Gegengrundsein are the kaosmici spaces where are thrown dinanzi, It are mitiko the places of the myth are those that are are found to us of forehead not to a horizon of the world, or to one perspective mondana, or a sunset or eclisse cosmic, but the Being is inhabited poeticamente from the horizon and the perspective of the Being without aim, decline, sunset, without eclisse, which eternal return of the resonance of the Being mitiko. Only therefore eventua the epochè of the history mitika, not teokratica, of the myth. A lot for being rigorous until in fondo:il myth are not the topology of the teocrazia, neither the myth are the cosmic nichilista singolarità of the imaginary time, giacchè those evocative topologies are always categories of the perspective of the tramontante world while the horizon of the Being mitiko is not never found of forehead to the eclisse, to the sunset, to the end of the history, the time, the space, the kosmo. In the myth instead there is the eternal return of the ontologica difference between the Gegenseyn and the Widerseyn: not null or the nothing, but the Being that us comes encounter, the Being that is thrown to the presence, in order to inhabit the Being that contemplates the glade. The history mitika of the myth is the history of the difference that eventua in the poetante ontologia, which presence that inhabits the kaosmico place. The history mitika of the myth is the history of the Being that contemplates the being of forehead, which presence of the glade, never has where not inhabited neither the entity, neither Is to us, neither the mondità, neither the metaphysics, neither the teocrazia, but only the resonance of the Being that us encounter comes, which eternal return. Pag. 06 the history mitika of the myth of the Physis is the history from the origins to the templari, a lot in order to inhabit the historical places of the myth, eventua in the resonance which To be itself mitiko divine Being that us comes encounter, Being that inhabits the Being, Being that meets itself kriptato in the Being Gpdimonderose buon0tt0
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento